EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-09/000417_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Sep 11 15:14:48 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-10-04 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179747688; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 15:14:48 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail04.mail.aol.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA178827594; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 15:13:14 -0700
Received: by mail04.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA07804; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 18:05:01 -0400
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 18:05:01 -0400
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Render difference Amiga/PC
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In a message dated 95-09-11 11:17:41 EDT, you write:

>How much difference is there between a frame of a scene rendered on
lightwave
>amiga v. 3.5 and and the same frame of the same scene rendered on
pre-release
>PC?  If I were to rerender some isolated frames in an animation that were
>originally rendered on amiga 3.5, but using the PC version.  Would there
>be a noticeable change in gamma etc...?

I do it all the time now. I've never noticed a difference when they're
assembled into
an animation, but then again I've never done a split screen comparison of the
two.

Dan Esmond
Animagic
Austin, TX
512-258-4120

--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]